Tag: Fed

The Fed’s New Rationale

Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell gave a speech at Jackson Hole, Wyoming to outline the Fed’s new rationale for monetary policy.  The purpose of the speech was to outline a new framework for the Fed’s monetary policy.

Chairman Powell said the review of monetary policy was motivated by “our evolving understanding of four key economic developments.”  The four economic developments that he listed are:

1. Assessments of the potential, or longer-run, growth rate of the economy have declined. For example, since January 2012, the median estimate of potential growth from FOMC participants has fallen from 2.5 percent to 1.8 percent.
2. The general level of interest rates has fallen both here in the United States and around the world. Estimates of the neutral federal funds rate, which is the rate consistent with the economy operating at full strength and with stable inflation, have fallen substantially, in large part reflecting a fall in the equilibrium real interest rate.
3. The record-long expansion that ended earlier this year led to the best labor market we had seen in some time. The unemployment rate hovered near 50-year lows for roughly 2 years, well below most estimates of its sustainable level.
4. The historically strong labor market did not trigger a significant rise in inflation. Over the years, forecasts from FOMC participants and private-sector analysts routinely showed a return to 2 percent inflation, but these forecasts were never realized on a sustainable basis.

The revised statement of longer-run goals and monetary policy was approved unanimously by the Federal Reserve Open Market Committee.  While some aspects of the Fed’s policy remain in place, Chairman Powell highlighted some changes.

1. The Fed expressly acknowledges that interest rates at the “lower bound” of its policy range reduces their scope to support the economy in the future by cutting interest rates.
2. Maximum employment is a broad-based and inclusive goal. They appreciate the benefits of a strong labor market, particularly for many in low- and moderate-income communities.
3. Going forward, employment can run at or above real-time estimates of its maximum level without causing concern, unless accompanied by signs of unwanted increases in inflation or the emergence of other risks.
4. Their actions to achieve both sides of their dual mandate (stable prices and maximum sustainable employment) will be most effective if longer-term inflation expectations remain well-anchored at 2 percent.

In a curious comment that seems designed to give the Fed more leeway, Chairman Powell said that they would not be tying themselves to a “particular mathematical formula” that defines average inflation.  Their approach “could be viewed as a flexible form of average inflation targeting.”

While the economic developments that Chairman Powell listed are accurate, some commentators believe the Fed needed a new rationale to justify the huge volume of purchases of US Treasury securities and, to a lesser extent, mortgage-backed securities.  Since September 4, 2019 (one year ago), the Fed has added $2,276 billion of US Treasury securities and $460 billion of mortgage-backed securities to their balance sheet.

The Congressional Budget Office is now projecting a federal budget deficit of $3.3 trillion for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2020.  This requires US Treasury debt issuance that far exceeds demand from the private sector, so the Fed buys much of the new debt.  The increase in the monetary base to accommodate federal deficit spending and US Treasury debt issuance is likely to lead to inflation that exceeds 2%, along with further declines in the US currency.

Note to Clients

Earlier this year, I asked clients for approval via e-mail or phone conversation to temporarily increase the maximum limit on the precious metals allocation from 15% to 30%.   I now expect the reasons for having a significant precious metals allocation to remain in place for some time.

During the next two weeks, I will be sending out revised investment guidelines to show a potential allocation range of 0 – 30% for precious metals.  In the past, I committed the maximum of 30% of portfolios to precious metals bullion.  This proved to be timely and the precious metals allocation in most accounts now exceeds the initial allocation of 30% because gold and silver have increased in price more than most securities.  I would also like some provision in the investment guidelines to acknowledge that the upper limit on the allocation may be exceeded due to better relative performance.  I am not necessarily a perma-bull on precious metals, but I believe it will continue to be an attractive asset class until the US and other governments take a rigorous stance against deficit spending and the creation of more fiat currencies.

If you have any questions, please contact me.

Sincerely,
Robert G. Kahl
CFA, CPA, MBA