Doubleline Round Table: Market Outlook

On January 10, DoubleLine Capital had a panel of some highly regarded investment strategists discuss their 2022 market outlooks.  56 minutes.  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sgvIEPd7M8E

On the panel were:

  • Jeffrey Sherman, Deputy Chief Investment Officer of DoubleLine Capital;
  • James Bianco, President and Macro Strategist at Bianco Research;
  • Danielle DiMartino Booth, CEO and Chief Strategist of Quill Intelligence;
  • Jeffrey Gundlach, Founder and CEO of DoubleLine Capital;
  • Ed Hyman, Chairman and Head of Research of Evercore ISI;
  • David Rosenberg, President, Chief Economist and Strategist of Rosenberg Research & Associates.

During the discussion, there are some references to S&P 500 earnings, Price/Earnings ratios, and 10 year US Treasury rates.  This website has graphs of the historical data.  See the tabs at the top.  https://www.multpl.com/

If you have any questions or comments, please contact me.

Robert G. Kahl
CFA, CPA, MBA

 

Are We There Yet?

Egon Von Greyerz is the Founder and Managing Partner of Matterhorn Asset Management and Gold Switzerland.  Matthew Piepenburg joined their firm last year.  Both provide thoughtful commentary and interviews.  Piepenburg acknowledges that they are “Swiss-based gold bugs.“

In his September 24 commentary, Piepenburg asks, “Why is Gold Not Rising?”  Good question given that:

    • Other commodities are reaching new highs.
    • Inflation rates are rising.
    • Interest rates are low and several percentage points below inflation rates.
    • Central banks around the world continue to expand their balance sheet assets at a rapid rate.
    • Governments show little or no fiscal discipline.

Piepenburg’s written commentary about Federal Reserve policy and gold’s purpose in an investment portfolio is located here: https://goldswitzerland.com/why-is-gold-not-rising/

If you prefer a video, Matthew Piepenburg was interviewed by Tom Bodrovics and discussed the international monetary system and related topics.  The video link is here (51 min):  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CZ9bNTl5kTE&t=599s  An index of the topics covered with time marks is located in the right margin of the video.

If you have any questions or comments, please contact me.

Sincerely,
Robert G. Kahl
CFA, CPA, MBA

If Not Now, When?

The financial press has been speculating about when the Federal Reserve (Fed) will taper asset purchases.  When they say “taper,” they mean reducing the rate of increase of asset purchases as opposed to an actual reduction of assets by the Fed as we saw for a brief period in 2018 – 2019.    READ MORE

Basel III and Its Impact on Bullion Pricing

There has been much commentary recently in the precious metals arena about Basel III bank regulations proposed by the Bank of International Settlements (BIS”) that are now in the process of being implemented and their potential impact on the price of gold and silver.

The Bank of International Settlements is a supranational organization based in Basel, Switzerland whose mission is to support central banks’ objective of monetary and financial stability through international cooperation.  It provides a forum for dialogue and cooperation to develop a common understanding and plans for common actions.  The BIS has proposed Basel III rules as a set of voluntary international financial standards agreed upon by BIS members in the aftermath of the 2008 financial crisis.

The Basel III regulations make a distinction between allocated and unallocated bullion accounts.  Allocated bullion accounts represent title and ownership of specific bars, with the dealer acting as custodian on the client’s behalf.  Similar to the contents of deposit boxes, allocated bullion deposits do not appear on a bank’s balance sheet.

Most bullion in London is traded and settled on an unallocated basis, where the customer does not own specific bars but has a paper claim to an amount of metal.  Thus, such contracts are often referred to as “paper gold.”  Unallocated gold obligations appear as a liability on a bank’s balance sheet.  The origin of all unallocated gold accounts is not the depositing of gold, but credit creation by banks.

Basel III regulations will classify banks’ actual physical gold holdings (allocated and held in their own vault) as safe, tier 1 assets along with cash.  Unallocated gold contracts will be classified as tier 3 assets against which greater reserves are required.  The new requirements became effective on June 28 for European banks.  US banks are required to comply effective July 1 and UK banks will begin compliance on January 1, 2022.  UK banks dominate bullion trading at the London Bullion Market Association (LBMA), so much of the impact may be delayed until later this year and early 2022.

The unallocated gold market in London is huge in comparison to the physical gold that is traded.  Approximately 600 metric tonnes of gold derivatives (unallocated gold) are traded daily between LBMA members.  This does not include trading between members and non-members or intraday turnover.

Alisdair Macleod, Head of Research at Goldmoney, and others believe that the introduction of Basel III regulations will have a significant impact on bullion trading by large banks and consequently the price of gold and silver.  Macleod writes:

The LBMA’s problem with Basel III becomes obvious. Unallocated gold liabilities cannot be used for funding the bank’s assets, and unallocated gold assets take a valuation haircut of 15% of market value as well. In the future, the former cannot be simply offset against the latter, but bullion banks in London naturally run unallocated positions on both sides of their balance sheets. Whether the bank owns vaulted allocated gold to offset some of the price risk is immaterial. If this Basel 3 proposal goes through without modification, it will effectively be the end of the LBMA’s forward settlement business, and the end of arbitrage and hedging between LBMA members and the CME’s Comex futures contracts.

Macleod argues that Comex futures for gold and silver will also be impacted.

The Swaps category on Comex (the bullion bank trading desks) is currently net short of about $24bn in the GC gold futures contract and $1.6bn in silver futures. Pressure to pare back ownership of these positions to a few genuine market makers and American bank trading desks is bound to increase, because the short positions held by European bullion banks would have to be covered…  And in London, all LBMA banking members will similarly reduce their unallocated activities because unbalanced books would be heavily penalized by the rule changes when they come in for the UK as well. That would make Comex gold and silver contracts entirely dependent on producer hedging.

Price manipulation in the gold and silver market has been frequent and obvious in the past as banks were able to create more precious metals derivatives out of nowhere.  That will be more difficult in the future as the role of derivatives declines and there is a greater reliance on physical gold and silver.

The likely result of the Basel III regulations is:

  • A reduction in open contracts at the LBMA and Comex for gold and silver bullion.
  • For those investors who want to retain price exposure to gold and silver, a shift from unallocated bullion contracts to physical bullion in a vault.
  • Higher prices for physical gold and silver bullion.

I wish all of you a Happy July 4th weekend.  If you have any questions or comments, please contact me.

Robert G. Kahl
CFA, CPA, MBA

Bonds, the Dollar, and Leverage – 4/6/2021

In the title of his latest commentary, Ray Dalio, Founder of Bridgewater Associates, asks “Why in the World Would You Own Dollar Debt?”  He argues that the current dynamic is “typical of the late stage of the long-term debt cycle.”

The world is a) substantially overweighted in bonds (and other financial assets, especially US bonds) at the same time that b) governments (especially the US) are producing enormous amounts more debt and bonds and other debt assets. This is particularly true for US bonds. US bond holdings are over a third of global bond holdings held by central banks, sovereign wealth funds, and international investors with the next largest country/currency bond being euro bonds at only roughly 60% of US bond holdings.  Their overweighted position in US bonds is largely because of the “exorbitant privilege” the US has had being the world’s leading reserve currency, which has allowed the US to overborrow for decades.  The cycle of becoming a reserve currency, overborrowing, and being overindebted threatening the reserve currency status is classic.

Some international investors are shifting a portion of their fixed income allocation from US$ bonds to Chinese bonds, which now account for about 6% of global portfolios.  Given the low interest rates in many countries, investors have also been willing to invest more in common stocks and precious metals.  However, bonds still have a place in portfolios for now, given valuation levels in the stock market that have already priced in a strong recovery.

The recent disclosure of some large bank losses due to business with Bill Hwang’s Archegos Capital raises some questions about derivatives and capital markets.  A record level of margin debt has contributed to higher prices in the stock market, but derivatives have added another source of leverage for speculators.

Bloomberg estimates that derivative contracts with Archegos caused the forced liquidation of more than $20 billion in holdings.  Much of the leverage used by Archegos was provided by Nomura Holdings Inc. and Credit Suisse Group AG via equity swaps and a type of derivative contract called contracts for difference.  Archegos may never actually have owned most of the underlying securities, preferring to bet on the highly levered derivatives contracts instead.  Among the stocks impacted by the forced liquidations was ViacomCBS which has dropped nearly 60% since March 22.  The prime brokerage losses have not been fully disclosed yet, but Credit Suisse has reported a loss of $4.7 billion so far due to their business relationship with Archegos.  Total losses for all banks are likely to exceed $10 billion.

Some of the large banks also have exposure in the precious metals markets with large short positions in silver, platinum, and gold.  Futures contracts for these three metals have a higher level of contractual open interest relative to global production than other commodities.  The short positions are highly concentrated among among eight large bank trading groups.  For example, the eight largest traders are net short silver an amount that would require 180 days of global mine production.  They are also net short platinum by 117 days and gold by 86 days of global mine production.

Investment demand for bullion and coins has picked up considerably from prior years.  Sprott Asset Management compared the total demand for coins and bars at three government mints: the US Mint, Perth (Australia) Mint, and Royal Canadian Mint.  For 2020, sales of gold coins and bars at the three mints was 157% higher than 2019, while the sale of silver coins and bars was 54% higher.  Gold and silver bullion ETFs have increased their inventories of bars.  Buyers of COMEX contracts are also requiring delivery of physical metal at higher levels than they did in past years.  Given government and central bank policies around the world, investment demand for precious metals is likely to continue or rise from current levels.  Higher prices should follow.

If you have any questions or comments, please contact me.

Robert G. Kahl
CFA, CPA, MBA